It was another mind numbingly boring afternoon at the Banks’s, as we mustered just three shots on target, but, fortunately, this time two went in. giving a home victory at last!

WFC Rob gives this week’s match report and, to be honest, I have to agree with almost everything in it. Personally, I’d have given Man of the Match to MacDonald, as he was the only player who didn’t make any mistakes (Vincent may have pushed him close, if he hadn’t have misjudged the cross for the goal).

I think Brentford also deserve some credit for at least rying to play some football on the puidding of a pitch.

Good win today in the sort of game we’re used to losing. The pitch was difficult and Brentford were typically tough to play against.

I think Hutchings called it well after the game when he said that we were just too lethargic in the first half. Every pass was made to look like the most difficult of chores and the ball ended up in the stands far too often. Whilst I wouldn’t go as far as saying they deserved to take the lead, they had shown marginally more intent to get the ball down and play than us, so their opening goal didn’t come as too much of a shock. I think Vincent made a bit of a hash of things – no striker should be given the time to chest the ball down that close to goal.
The one moment of reasonable quality in the first half from our point of view produced our goal. A turn of pace by Westlake left his marker on his backside, Byfield made the right run, held the ball up well and put it on a plate for Nicholls to finish well. It was nothing too difficult, but was perhaps the only bit of quality shown by us in the first half.

The one thing we changed in the second half was our tempo. Taundry got himself on the ball a bit more, and we kept the ball well down the left at times. It was disappointing to see Byfield squander two good chances by over-doing things inside the box, but the previously erratic Nicholls came up with another rare piece of quality to give Deeney an easy finish. What followed was a professional spell of keep-ball, which was pleasing to see even if Smith almost got himself an unecessary red card.

We’ll probably played better than that previously this season and lost, so it was good to see a hard-fought win at home, particularly now that next year’s season tickets are on sale. I thought our best performers were McDonald (who commanded the air despite his long ball game being wide of the mark), Taundry (who looked to keep things simple on a difficult pitch) and Nicholls (who came up with two rare moments of quality). Other than that, I think we’d be looking at 6 out of 10 ratings for the majority, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

It’s not often I agree with old football clichés, but Chris Hutchings is absolutely spot on when he said this week that the win on Tuesday at Elland Road means nothing if we don’t go out and get a result at home on Saturday against Brentford. The interest raised by the win at the League leaders is likely to bring more punters in on Saturday, so the pressure will be on the players to produce a performance, something which has been woefully lacking at the Banks’s at times this season, especially in the last two games, where we mustered just three shots on target.

That lack of home form is what is holding the team back at the moment. Granted the absence of any atmosphere doesn’t help, but it has to be said that the lack of a creative spark in the side leads to too much long ball football and few chances being made. The signing of Julian Gray may well address some of that particular issue, but the return of Steve Jones would also be most welcome, as his replacement, Till, has been mostly disappointing. The good news is that there is an outside chance of him figuring tomorrow.

Given Hutchings’ normal pattern, however, I don’t expect him to change a winning side, other than the possible return of Byfield for Till, with Nicholls moving to the wing (unless he is confident of Jones’s fitness, that is). That gives a probable starting XI of:

Ince, Westlake, MacDonald, Vincent, Richards, Till, Mattis, Taundry, Gray, Deeney, Nicholls.

As for Brentford, midfielder Marcus Bean has declared himself fit for the game.

The Bees “midfield general” has been sidelined since last month with a knee injury, but returned to full training this week. However, the 25-year-old admits he may have to settle for a place on the bench at the Banks’s because of the form of Kevin O’Connor and Toumani Diagouraga.

He said: “I feel a lot better. The injection worked, and I’ve been training all week with no effects. I felt I done well before I got injured, but Toumani has come in and done brilliant, so I’m not going to be knocking on the gaffer’s door just yet.” (“Done brilliant”? Will footballers ever learn to speak English correctly and find out about adverbs?).

Predictions

Brentford go into this game in mid table, just two points behind us, with a game in hand. Their away record is nothing to shout about, with 3 wins, 3 defeats and 7 draws, but we do have to remember that our home record is very poor, consisting of just 4 wins, 7 draws and 4 defeats. Brentford’s difficulties are summed up by the fact that they have scored just 7 times in those 13 away games, while conceding 14. If ever a game had 1 – 0 to the home side written all over it, then this is it, but I can’t help thinking we need to show more than just a competent narrow win, if there are more fans there as a result of Tuesday night. We shall see.

Let’s not go overboard – it was only Leeds – but the Saddlers pulled off their result of the season last night by beating Leeds 2-1, thereby ending the Yorkshire outfit’s unbeaten home league record.

Dwayne Mattis and Clayton McDonald got the goals – and the message board is alive with thoughts from Saddlers fans and a few other well-wishers from other teams in league one. Give your reaction after you’ve read BangSection:

Every single player (bar Till who struggled again and was replaced at HT) played their part and we refused to buckle even when Leeds had us under the cosh for most of the second half. Deeney led the line superbly and he and Nicholls chased everything. Mattis score a really good goal after good work from Gray who will do well for us this season on the evidence of tonight. McSheffrey scored a hugely jammy equaliser which I’m not sure you can blame Clayton for (I’ve just seen it on Sky Sports and the swerving flight of the ball – definitely a cross – looks a nightmare for a keeper – anyway, who cares?). We defended like lions after they pegged us back – I thought Max Gradel would rip Richards apart when he came on but our makeshift leftback stuck to his task superbly. Then we went up the other end and scored!

Let me clear one thing up – our winning goal was definitely over the line. We were right in line with it and the linesman was in a great position and gave it straight away. Again we held on simply through hard work and getting bodies in the way. A word for the supporters too – tremendous. Never stopped singing throughout the whole game – especially during the second half and after the final whistle the entire team (and Hutchings) came over to show their appreciation. What an utterly fantastic night – one where all the frustrations of supporting Walsall go out of the window and you simply revel in defying the odds and getting one over on a club with ten times the resources we have. What supporting a club like Walsall should be all about, in fact.

As the season meanders along on the pitch, with little or no purpose, we inevitably seem to be getting into a cycle of one good (or at least decent) performance, followed by one abysmal one. The point was made at the Focus Meeting last night that all that achieves is leaving the fans with little or no hope of progress, just stagnation, which, in turn, contributes to the ever declining gates. That makes a trip to Elland Road even more welcome. At least the team ought to be up for this (if they aren’t, they shouldn’t be professional footballers) and, after the shocking performance at Oldham on Saturday, they should be due something better!

The Saddlers will be without the injured Parkin, Jones and Weston for this one, but Hutchings will have some other decisions to make. Hughes and Smith should be fit for the game, and, knowing Hutchings’s predilections, we might well see changes to the centre of the defence, as the “book” probably says “play your most experienced players in this type of game”. For the same reason, we may well see the return of Darren Byfield to the starting lineup, especially as Nicholls did not make the hoped for impact on being given his chance, and we may also have Julian Grey starting, although he, in theory, probably needs a couple of reserve outings to get match fit.

As for the opposition, Leeds are still sweating on the fitness of leading goalscorer Jermaine Beckford who has missed the last two games through injury.

Defender Patrick Kisnorbo once again looks set to be missing as he struggles to overcome an ankle injury and he would likely to be replaced by Michalik. The former Bolton man isn’t quite of the same class as Kisnorbo, it has to be said.

Leeds are also still without long term injured Shane Higgs and Ben Parker.

Predictions?

Leeds, since their win at Old Trafford, something which, knowing their fans, probably means they are calling themselves Champions of England, to go along with the “Champions of Europe” chant they are so fond of just because they got to the final once, have seen their form go somewhat to pieces. They have drawn at home with Wycombe, then lost away at Exeter, lost at home to Carlisle, lost heavily at Swindon, beaten Colchester at home and drawn at Hartlepool and Orient. Six points out of a possible twenty one, then and Norwich now lead them be four points. They do have two games in hand, however, and need to win them and should be up for this one. They have a home record of won 10, drawn 4, lost 0. Ooops. Home win, I’m afraid.

Well, they say that after the Lord Mayor’s Show comes the dustcart – well, following a good result on Tuesday, a whole fleet of the damn things turned up for the Saddlers at Boundary Park yesterday. This, according to more than one poster, was probably amongst the very worst performaces of the season (or last, under Mullen, for that matter). Moaning Old Git supplies the words this week:-

We were trully appalling, how can a team expect to win matches when we have no attack?
Our defence, or should I say McDonald on his own, was uncomfortable all game against a team that used wingers
and attacking half backs to great effect, although there finishing was abysmal, we were run ragged by a team that was one point off the relegation zone.

What could anyone who was there say anything positive about that performance today? inept.
Ince was badly at fault for the goal, waiting on the far side of his goal to collect a cross that was met point blank by
Abbott who got in front of him far too easily, which was a shame really, cus he prevented us losing by a clear 5 or 6 goals!

I think we got one corner, which was squandered, and I can remember one shot that got close to the goalmouth, sort of!
Till was atrocious, does he know which way to kick? Wendy tried hard, but is obviously lacking any quality whatsoever.
And who was that lanky streak of flap that was bought on in the second half? who the hell is Julian Gray and how come
we’ve got lumbered with THAT waste of space, I think he touched the ball twice and lost it both times!

Oldham were up for it bigtime, they lack quality, but are attempting to put that right with signings, and showed great
enthusiasm, commitment and energy, characters that we sadly lacked completely, we were just ‘not at the races’ at
all. Byfield got too involved in a ‘handbags at dawn’ squable with his ex team mates, so drifted out of the game utterly.
Barn door rushed round a lot, but he will never make a footballer if he lives to be old!

And it was friggin freezin as usual, what the hell is going to happen on Tuesday? We are going to get slaughtered,
it will be sooo humiliating! NOT A GOOD DAY to be a Walsall fan…………

A win from what seems nowhere on Tuesday night means that the table has taken on a better aspect this week. Of course, some of the signs were there, in terms of improved defensive performances, despite the disruption caused by injury, but the major difference may well be that we have been playing with a “proper” defensive midfielder, in the shape of Taundry, rather than two “generalists”, as we were with Mattis and Bradley. The lack of a creative spark still is showing, though, and the news that Jones may be returning to training is welcome, to say the least.

One swallow does not a summer make, however, and we still have two away games to negotiate this week, in the shape of Oldham and Leeds United. Strangely enough, I feel less apprehensive about the Leeds game than Saturday’s, as, if the players aren’t up for playing in front of the best part of 30,000 at Elland Road, we are in trouble.

So, off we go to the coldest ground in the football league (although Grimsby and Hartlepool can run it close). Oldham are always one of those clubs that I think we can feel some affinity with, for all that they have had a little more success over the years (three League titles, some FA Cup and League Cup success and spells in the top flight), as they also struggle with being too close to too many teams (Boundary Park is less than 9 miles from the stadiums of Bury, Manchester City, Manchester United, and Rochdale, plus Blackburn and Bolton aren’t that far away). Despite that, however, and a struggling League position, they are still averaging the best part of a thousand a game more than we are. For those at the club blaming the recession, by the way, Walsall’s unemployment rate is 5.4%, according to the DWP figures, while Oldham’s is 8.1%, the second highest rate in Greater Manchester. Food for thought there, then.

The Saddlers will be without the injured Jones and Weston, however, and Sam Parkin was also out through injury against Bristol Rovers, giving Nicholls his chance to play. Manny Smith should be available again, as should Hughes, so that will be Hutchings’s biggest selection headache, as the defence has performed so well without those two. Doubtless Darren Byfield will be eager to play against his old team.
As for Oldham, they have had a terrible time with injuries of late, something which they are using to explain their lowly league position. The emergency loan window reopened this week with Oldham boss Dave Penney trying to attract new players despite the bulk of his first-team squad returning from injury.
Penney was able to name arguably his strongest squad of the season to date for the trips to Tranmere Rovers and Swindon Town with the likes of Chris Taylor and Alex Marrow among the substitutes.
“We’re still looking for players,” Assistant Manager Gray admitted. “There’s one or two options we’re looking at and the manager has been on the phone a lot trying to sort something out in case the right player comes along. Saturday showed the value of having a good bench because we were able to bring Chris Taylor on but Alex Marrow – who has been a regular for most of the season – didn’t play. There’s one or two others who are coming back with Jon Worthington only a week or two away from coming back, which will be a big plus.”
Those efforts have bought former Preston and Norwich winger Simon Whalley in on trial, amongst others, but he hasn’t signed yet.

Predictions?

Oldham are clear of the relegation places on goal difference only. It’s a poor home record that’s keeping them there, too, having won 3, drawn 5 and lost 5 at Boundary Park. The fact that they’ve scored a mere 11 goals in those 13 games is at the heart of the problem. With our defensive record of late, we shouldn’t concede, so it ought to be a draw at the very least!

The erudite (look it up) Welsh Saddler provides the match report for what was a welcome win at Bristol Rovers last night, a team with an above average home record. That will have stopped the rot, with any luck, of the bad run we have been on and we now have the opportunity to consolidate for the rest of the season. It also leaves us with the strange record of now having won more games away than at home (although we have picked up one more home point), something which tends to show a lack of creativity when trying to break teams down at home.

A result like that is all the better when you go to the ground expecting absolutely nothing (as we 4 from South Wales did, in all honesty). For the first ten or fifteen minutes it looked like only a matter of time before Rovers would score; both teams had started like greyhounds out of the traps, one or two challenges were shall we say, enthusiastic, and both teams had a man booked by a referee who was keen to stamp his authority on the game. Following the two bookings there was another free kick against Walsall, and the referee called over the Walsall captain with the offending player for a reading of the riot act.

After this first quarter of an hour things settled down somewhat, and bit by bit the Saddlers established a good degree of control over the midfield. It was noticeable throughout the game that episodes of head-tennis always ended with a Walsall player managing to get the ball down on the ground and try to do something constructive with it. We began to press forward, with good moves down both flanks, and at the end of one down the left wing we were treated to a Walsall player strongly tackling back to regain possession, and fire a low cross into the box – a defender blocked it, but the ball squirted out to the centre edge of the penalty area where Taundry was steaming in. Fair play to the lad, he had the presence of mind to firmly sidefoot the ball along the ground rather than blasting it to kingdom come, and it was as sweet a strike on goal as you could expect. I have to say at this stage that I thought (and still think) that Deeney did the assist work from the left wing rather than Nicholls, but at the end of the day it’s the goal that counts. That was after 32 minutes.

Although it wasn’t a dirty game by any means, Rovers players seemed to hit the deck hard and often – they had used three substitutes by half-time, which came with the score 0-1 to the super Saddlers. Ince had only had a couple of tame shots straight at him to deal with by then, as opposed to the Rovers keeper who made one fine save to turn away a strong daisy-cutter from Nicholls for a corner, and conceded a goal as well. The hot “Cornish” pasties and Bovril went down very well during the interval, because it really was very cold!

The second half was “more of the same”… Rovers were relying on high balls up to their front men, but MacDonald’s heading strength and the covering work by all the defenders made sure that practically nothing even reached Clayton Ince. I have to mention Darryl Westlake at this point – he played a real blinder, and showed a composure on the ball commensurate with someone much older and more experienced. Everything was going so well until about 15 minutes from the end, when the Rovers right winger, instead of crossing the ball to Ince, decided to cut inside and venture into the penalty area – it only warranted the slightest contact from Vincent, and down he went and the referee pointed straight to the spot, no hesitation at all.

“Here we go” we all thought, and as the Rovers player was poised to take the kick I noticed that Ince was actually standing well behind his goal line (which worried me a little). However, he shuffled forward and either guessed or planned right, diving to his right side and palming the ball away. To his credit, the Rovers player followed up and blasted the ball towards the goal but Ince (with a better save in my book) again got his hands to the ball and put it out of harm’s way for a corner. Deep joy.

From then it was apparent that Rovers were having one of those games – they weren’t going to score, and their cause wasn’t helped by the large home following chanting “What a load of rubbish”….. it was a fellow UTS-er, grantwilliamsllb, who said “Listen, they’re singing our song!!!” Rovers had another substitution, and then we did have a few minutes of squeaky-bum time until the 3 minutes of time added on were up. We didn’t make a single substitution (so much for Hutchings’ comment about the players being tired…)

It’s very difficult to give individual match summaries, because this was a real team effort. Everyone worked their socks off, they harried and chased, and there wasn’t a noticeable weak link anywhere in the eleven. If I had to single any out, I would have to mention Clayton Ince’s penalty save….. Westlake’s polished performance (Weston won’t get a sniff if he carries on playing like this)…… Deeney and Nicholls’ workrate was phenomenal…… Richards tracking back at high speed and challenging for the smallest scraps….. MacDonald’s steadying influence at the heart of the defence reminded me of Albert McPherson of fond memories….. the number of crosses that our wingers put across (high numbers!!!) etc.

Worth mentioning as well was our ability to play football, passing it to our own players (for a change?). This was especially apparent in the last fifteen minues or so, when we played “keep-ball” in the Rovers’ half, working neat triangles – it was lovely to watch.

Having said all that, perhaps we should keep our feet on the ground…. I may have been looking at the whole game through rose-coloured spectacles, because as we trooped off to find a warm car, a lady Bristol Rovers steward used that immortal phrase to me when she said “Well, you were crud, but we were worse” !!!!!

Well, we know what to expect tomorrow night, as we only played Bristol Rovers on Saturday! Following yet another disappointing home performance, fans will be desperate to get something out of the return game. Chris Hutchings may have said that he was happy with a share of the spoils after the game, but he must be just about the only one. We are now just five points clear of the relegation places, with three consecutive away games to come. This one, Leeds and Oldham (one of the teams desperately trying to catch us).

The talk of making the play offs that abounding from the camp earlier in the season now looks to have been totally unrealistic, as we are now 15 points behind sixth place and in danger of being dragged into a relegation scrap. That might be not such a worry, if not for the fact we are just not creating any chances, with just 3 shots in target in the last 180 minutes of football at home.

It might also be time to remind Chris Hutchings that his record is won 17, drawn 17, lost 19, compared to his predecessor’s, the hapless Jimmy Mullen, of won 10, drawn 5, lost 14. Hutchings is averaging 1.28 points per game, Mullen 1.20 – almost identical. Remember also that Bonser’s stated reasons for sacking Mullen were a poor home record and falling gates. Well, this season, we have a home record of won only 4, drawn 7 and lost 4 and gates are plummeting.

So, that means that we have to try to get something out of this game. Hughes may have been on the bench, but he hasn’t trained and neither has Manny Smith. Weston is out, so the defence picks itself.

Up front, Deeney is available and will be likely to return (although I thought Parkin had a decent game considering the scraps he was getting). Byfield, however, looks out of sorts, but I don’t think Hutchings will take the drastic step of leaving him out.

That leaves the midfield. To me, Saturday proved Mattis and Taundry are too alike, but, if one were to be dropped, it’d be Mattis for me, as I thought Taundry had the better game. Nicholls ought to get the nod ahead of the ineffective Till, or Richards, who had his poorest game for some weeks on Saturday, but he probably won’t. I suspect Deeney for Parkin will be the only change.

As for Rovers, it’s just as difficult to predict their line up, as manager Trollope is holding out the prospect of loan signings (whatever they are) before the game. Just what we need, fresh blood.

Predictions?

Rovers’ away form wasn’t too good, so we had a decent chance to get three points on Saturday, but, quite frankly, never looked like it and, certainly, didn’t deserve it. At home, though, they tend to be a different proposition, with a record of won 8, drawn 1, lost 4. That “lost 4” looks a little more promising, of course, but I think we’ll be lucky to get anything out of this one.

A dour game by all accounts, summed up by the scoreline.

UTS regular ‘1933′ summed up all the action in his two paragraph post on the match thread here

Today was my first match of the year having missed the last 3 home games despite having a season ticket. I guess I’ve got out of the habit of going to the matches and today it was not difficult to see why. It pains me to say that I won’t be renewing for next season, unless things change drastically.

The starting line-up drained me of all confidence and it’s easy to say that what choice has Hutchings got with all injuries and suspensions but the guy has had plenty of opportunity to get signings in and he hasn’t so far. Starting Nicholls would have been more effective than Parkin or Till who have both had more chances then Nicholls this season and have failed to impress on every occasion.

All in all not the most successful day at work for WFC. We need to learn to find the back of this thing.

How hard can it be?

At the start of this run of late January/February games culminating in the trip to Leeds, I said that I thought that we needed to take seven points to stay comfortably out of trouble. Well, having lost to Norwich and drawn with Gillingham and Charlton, tomorrow’s fixture with Bristol Rovers has suddenly become another of those “must win” fixtures, followed as it is by two away games. Granted that the performances in the two home fixtures were much better, but now we are likely to be faced with severe injury and suspension problems.

Deeney will be missing, following his brainless sending off on Tuesday night, but it doesn’t stop there. Hughes and Smith both have injuries which have prevented them training, so Hughes’s appearance on the bench in the week was desperation stakes. Weston’s problem when he went off was a hamstring, so that should mean a couple of weeks, if it’s just a tweak, or six to eight weeks, if it’s a tear. Jones will still be, presumably missing, as he slowly turns into this season’s version of Stephen Roberts or Allan Picken. Trouble is, he’s a much more important member of the squad than either of those two unfortunates.

Hutchings’ main choice, given the paucity of resources, is who to play on the right wing and who to play in central midfield (given the near certainty of Parkin replacing Deeney). Nicholls did little on replacing Till on Tuesday night, so it’s a matter of pays your money and takes your choice there, but Taundry did enough to keep his slot ahead of Bradley. Of course, he might go completely left of field and play a 4 5 1, with Taundry holding and Bradley and Mattis having a free role, but I don’t think he’d take the risk of Byfield or Parkin as a lone striker.

As for Rovers, manager Trollope (still one of my all time favourite footballing names, from back in the days when it was his Dad, rather than him), has a couple of injury problems. There will probably be a few changes from the team that lost to Orient, as full back Aaron Lescott and top scorer Chris Lines are both suffering from injuries picked up in that game.

Trollope said: “We have got a couple of injuries. Aaron Lescott is going to be struggling with a hip flexor injury and Chris Lines had some severe abdominal pains later on in the game at Orient. He has not trained he is going to have a scan and is looking doubtful as well. Both of those players will be a blow for us, but it will give others a chance”.

Predictions?

Rovers lie ninth in the table, seven points better off than the Saddlers. Their record, both at home and away, though, is a curious mixture of good and bad. Away, which is what interests us until Tuesday night, at least, it’s won 4 (not bad), drawn 1 and lost 9 (terrible). They have conceded 29 goals away, including 5 in their last defeat at improving Orient. This, then ought to be a game we should win, if the reserve players do their stuff and we don’t get a ref like we did on Tuesday!