I look forward to listening to Rob and Harley discussing the saddlers and found this particular one worthwhile because there are so many ways of looking at the situation as regards DJ.
It was certainly food for thought when looking at how the team could be changed to allow Draper and Johnson to play together.
I may have missed it so apologies if it was mentioned but when the talk turned to the midfield I never heard Earring’s name and wondered if and when he’s fully fit where he could be utilised in order to accommodate DJ and Draper being paired.
Not sure I believe that. Lincoln will have access to all of his data and stats from every game and training session. They would make a judgment on his burnout from the data and surely would have some influence on whether we should play him or rest him. With the threat of recalling him in January as persuasion if they can’t actually enforce their wishes contractually.
If he is burnt out it is Lincolns responsibility as well as ours.
They should have known about that in the summer when deciding to loan him out for a full season straight after a 4 month loan spell.
I don’t actually think he’s been used THAT much though, he barely played in pre season, then missed the first two games of the season with suspension.
In the first three games he was subbed off in all of them, then Sadler said he wasn’t quite match fit and needed minutes and since then he’s played another 10 games, completing 90 minute games just six times.
I had doubts about the ‘Lincoln being unhappy’ rumour too. Perhaps someone with a better knowledge of how loan contracts are structured could put me right, but if you loan out a player, are you not basically allowing the club you’re loaning to to use the player as they see fit? I mean obviously if you’re playing them wildly out of position or treating them like dirt, that’s a whole different matter, but if they get injured or ‘burned out’, it’s unfortunate but is it not just an occupational hazard?