Working Party Questions - Dec 2018


#61

Only suggested 3 questions this time because Steve said the meeting would be an hour only because Mole and Gamble had to attend other meetings, which I presume was the 13 minute AGM.


#62

If Mole and Gamble know the supporter’s have a few constructive question’s that they want to put forward to try and better the club , and that they feel concerned about how thing’s are going couldn’t they just give Steve and who ever a little more time or arrange another meeting when they haven’t got to rush off somewhere else ?


#63

That would imply they take the supporter’s concerns seriously …


#64

…and that they actually care … Mole and Gamble i mean , not the supporter’s


#65

…It just feel’s a little like …


#66

To be honest, it’s at the discretion of the Trust. I don’t know if there is a certain volume or topic of questions that they’d be unwilling to present to the club from one source, especially UTS.


#67

But aren’t the supporter’s one of the most important part’s of a Football Club or am i missing something …


#68

That’s the problem!


#69

…what us ?


#70

Particularly yow :rofl:


#71

Not sure we come anywhere near their list of priorities, regrettably.


#72

thank’s mate , only trying to make our club a little better for us all …:pleading_face:


#73

Sense of humour bypass?
Was not meant to offend


#74

no offence taken mate :rofl:


#75

Thanks


#76

I’m very tongue in cheek as you may of gathered from various thread’s on here but that is only to put a bit of humour on here and hopefully put a few smile’s on some face’s .
I know you didn’t mean to offend , and you didn’t my reply was jokingly having a dig , but i’m serious about the club , and get proper ■■■■■■ off the way the club treat us as supporter’s most of the time