please ask him to remove the Fotress Bescot sign - it is embarassing
1 Like
is it time to remove Gamble and Mole from their jobs - they were Bonser yes men - time for a fresh start
1 Like
Thats not going to happen you would imagine. Pomlett described them both as outstanding in their field.
We might get to see Gamble and Mole do their thang now Bonser has disappeared. Think they deserve that chance at least.
However if the club doesnt move forward in the next five years then Gamble and Mole will need to be questioned again.
9 Likes
Totally agree, Gamble and Mike have always come across well when Iâve met them, always felt like they had to approach every conversation on the defensive as the hatred towards the board grew out of control. They have a new boss now, clean slate, let them have this chance with our support and if they fail then question them. Personally I hope both of them take this chance and go on as part of a period of unprecedented success for our club and do us proud.
7 Likes
I agree. Letâs see how they go about their roles with a new man in charge. Pomlett obviously speaks highly of them. I think what we may see is a better and clearer structure at the club which may mean more expertise recruited to enhance the day to day running.
2 Likes
their roles are paid employees, not owners. They deal with all the paperwork like VAT returns, transfer dealings, registration, organisational things like booking the coaches and hotels for team travel. Why people think they should be spokesmen for the club is beyond me. They have media people who should be fronting the organisation. Our previous owner would not face anyone. I think the new bloke will do that very well.
1 Like
They carried the can as organ grinders for so long, give them a chance I say.
2 Likes
Heâs publicly backed his management team (as he called it) so theyâll either deliver and do a good job or frankly (he seems the sort of guy that wonât suffer fools) theyâll more than likely be looking for other opportunitiesâŚ
Hopefully theyâll step up (out of the restraints of outdated leadership/management of Uncle Jeff) and prove Leigh right!
3 Likes
Be good to see a good turn out tomorrow night to meet and welcome Leigh as our new owner 
Having been there to witness Ramsdenâs helicopter arrival on the park next to the old fellows park and doing the town hall rallyies and marches back in the early/mid eighties to get rid of Wheldon, I feel duty bound to attend tomorrow.
4 Likes
Youâre most probably right.
But say if you had spent a career in logistics. Youâd possibly know the value of a big piece of land in the middle of the country right next to a key motorway and rail line. You could build a new stadium elsewhere and have enough change to discharge your liabilities to the previous owner and landlord.
Liberation. Ironically paid for by the land that imprisoned us.
Wonât happen. But itâs a thought.
2 Likes
Hope we build the new stadium in Essington 
Councillor Clifft might have something to say about thatâŚ
1 Like
I have absolutely no idea whether you actually know something or are only speculating, but âŚ
A new ground takes time to acquire and then build, and if it doesnât already exist you canât just walk away from your current ground - unless you are going to ground share somewhere else in the interim?
And that presupposes that you can just walk away when you want. We have a 99 year lease (20+ years down) plus a 25 year extension option; but what is the notice period we have to give to move out or are there set break points? Walk away on a whim and you are still liable for the rent until then.
Not saying it wonât be viable, but there are a lot of what ifs, and it likely wouldnât be a free walk away.
But all that is speculating that LP wants to do that to start with. In his interview he says itâs one of his priorities to reunite the club with the ground, but he also says the fact that itâs not already has been blown out of all proportion (and even made the point that not owning your ground and having to pay rent is not uncommon). He also says that even if/when it is owned by the club, it wonât make that much of a difference anyway. He also talks about maximising our conference and banqueting capabilty - which pretty much sounds like the stadium we already have than some speculative new build.
Going by what he said, whether itâs owned by Bonser, us, or someone else, and whether we could just walk or it would cost us, I donât see us moving from the Banksâs anytime soon.
I happen to totally agree with him - let it go! It was always the pea under the mattress rather than the real issue - which is maximising the amount available to the playing side without jeopardising the other bits (which involves increasing revenue). If we are doing well nobody cares, itâs only when things are going badly that fingers start being pointed. Would you care who owns the bloody pitch or how much it is costing us to play on it if we were playing on it in the Championship (if not the EPL)?
And for Christâs sake, who in their right minds want to go to Aldridge anyway? To most people itâs just a place you have to go through on the way to Streetly crem.
1 Like
I agree Andy which is why I said âwonât happenâ.
I donât particularly like The Bescot but itâs where we are and what we have so it is 75% likely that LP will make the most of it and speculation about moving is just that. Speculation.
I agree about Aldridge too. Never seen it as one of the most WFC part of the borough. In fact far from it.
The ownership issue first reared its head in the real public domain in the mid 2000s. When we moved from Fellows Park there was no internet in the sense we have now, and it was only after the subject was broached in the new forums that were proliferating then that people realised what had gone on. That resulted in the second wave of stayaways (the first being those that avidly read the press and fanzines in the late 1980s and saw what had happened first hand).
Itâs bubbled along ever since, and frankly, weâre talking about it now not because weâve been relegated but because Bonser the owner has sold the club to become just Bonser the landlord. He was one of the architects of the separation of club and ground, so understandably many supporters care who owns it, as is shown in the discussions.
It may be that people moan more when we arenât doing so well, but thatâs human nature, and doesnât mean they donât give a flying fuck if goals are going in at the right end - they do, but they are also happy to celebrate what little success we have.
Ownership to me is securing what was rightfully ours in the first place, and having the security that comes with it. Pomlettâs take over is a step in the right direction, and hopefully itâll lead to improvements in finances long term, although it might just be that Bonserâs left it so late weâll only see a âdead cat bounceâ effect. I truly hope that is not the case. More money through the club gives us the opportunity to do some of the overdue maintenance on the stadium, which has been neglected in recent years, and enhance the matchday experience - a virtuous cycle replacing Bonserâs stalinist regime of starvation and autocracy.
The club shouldnât be in Aldridge - totally agree.
3 Likes
Is it my computer , or Mr Pomlett very softly spoken ?
I canât hear a thing on any of the videos . However the intro music rattles the windows.
(Naff all wrong with Aldridge by the way. However Iâm sure Wfc wonât be going there, and why should they).
Because they are Directors of the club, so by default should be qualified to front up the business.
Thatâs pretty standard for most companies around the country in this day and age. Itâs no shock that Pomlett has taken on that responsibility, he could clearly see the failings.
Any new ground should be at readswood. The place it should have been built in the first place
1 Like
Im sure he told me at work heâs stepped down from it now
3 Likes
I donât know of any notice period, but there is a break point coming up in around 8 years.